Legal Opinion

Edmondson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1933No. 16047Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is swindling; the punishment, a fine of one dollar.

The property alleged to have been acquired by appellant is described in the complaint and information as one pair of shoes. The value of the shoes is not alleged. It is the rule in theft cases that when the value of the property affects the penalty it must be alleged. Branch’s Annotated Penal Code, section 2487; Sheppard v. State, 1 Texas App., 522; Pittman v. State, 14 Texas App., 576; Ellison v. State, 8 S. W., 462. The rule is theft cases, as to alleging value, applies in swindling cases. Mathis v. State, 18 S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Trigg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API