Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Blum

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 31, 1916Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Thomas B. Carroll against Max D: Blum. P'rom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

Plaintiff sued upon an agreement of defendant, dated April 11, 1913, which, so far as material, reads as follows:

“To secure the payment due Mr. Thomas B. Carroll for moneys expended, * * represented now by one note for $670, held by Mr. Carroll personally, and one note for $500, * * * which has been renewed by the said Carroll by giving his own note for said sum, the undersigned herein assigns and transfers the sum of $1,170 out of any or all cash moneys that may be recovered, * * * and Messrs. Slade & Slade are hereby authorized * * * to pay Mr. Carroll the said sum of $1,170, and upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Bigler v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
Pope v. Terre Haute Car & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
Dunham v. . MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
Nelson v. . Plimpton Fire-Proof E. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
Stern v. McKeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.