Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Utilities District v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1978No. 41384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

White, C. Thomas, J.

This is an appeal from the grant of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an action by plaintiff Metropolitan Utilities District against defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland on a written guaranty. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

In January 1972, Damark Properties, Inc., entered into a contract with the plaintiff Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha. The contract provided that the district would install a number of gas mains in Eldorado, a subdivision owned by Damark which is located at approximately 144th Street and West Dodge Road, Omaha,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Custom Leasing, Inc. v. Carlson Stapler & Shippers Supply, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Smith v. BaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. City National Bank v. DenslowNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  5. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. RegierNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Craig v. Hastings State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nogg Bros. Paper Co. v. BickelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Mabile v. Drivers Management, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. METRO. UTIL. DIST., ETC. v. Fid. & Dep. Co. of MarylandNebraska Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API