Legal Opinion

Kraft Foodservice, Inc. v. Hardee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1994No. 937SC297PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant argues that the trial court erred by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. After carefully examining the record before us, we must agree.

Summary judgment is a device whereby judgment is rendered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Dickens v. Thorne, 110 N.C. App. 39, 429 S.E.2d 176 (1993), N.C.R. Civ. P. 56(c).

The pertinent facts surrounding the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Dickens v. ThorneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Palm Beach, Inc. Ex Rel. Evan Picone, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kraft Foodservice, Inc. v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API