Legal Opinion

Kiefer v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1978No. Docket 77-1436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, P. J.

The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. [hereafter A & P] appeals from the entry of a default judgment in favor of plaintiff. The default was taken when A & P’s insurer’s adjuster failed to appeal at the mandatory settlement conference, Wayne County Court Rule 13.1, 1 when requested to do so by the court. The trial court refused to set aside the default. We affirm.

Plaintiff brought suit against A & P for damages sustained from a slip and fall on ice in a parking lot shared by A & P and other businesses. A & P initiated a third-party action against those businesses and the snow removal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Asmus v. BarrettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Butler v. CannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Luplow v. Aubry Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Henry v. PrusakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Glasner v. GriffinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kornak v. Auto Club Ins Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. McGEE v. MACAMBO LOUNGE, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API