Kiefer v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, P. J.
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. [hereafter A & P] appeals from the entry of a default judgment in favor of plaintiff. The default was taken when A & P’s insurer’s adjuster failed to appeal at the mandatory settlement conference, Wayne County Court Rule 13.1, 1 when requested to do so by the court. The trial court refused to set aside the default. We affirm.
Plaintiff brought suit against A & P for damages sustained from a slip and fall on ice in a parking lot shared by A & P and other businesses. A & P initiated a third-party action against those businesses and the snow removal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Asmus v. BarrettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Butler v. CannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Luplow v. Aubry Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Henry v. PrusakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Glasner v. GriffinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kornak v. Auto Club Ins Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- McGEE v. MACAMBO LOUNGE, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.