Buffington v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBkoyles, C. J.
1. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the court erred in overruling a motion (made when the case was called and before the signing.of the plea) to disqualify the solicitor pro tern, from proceeding with the prosecution, *163on the ground that he was related within the prohibited degree to the prosecutor of the case. See Pinkney v. State, 22 Ga. App. 105 (95 S. E. 539), and citations.
Decided December 9, 1924.
2. Evidence as to articles forcibly taken from the person of the accused, tending to establish his guilt of the offense of which he is charged, is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walker v. WhittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Coon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Shefton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Clemons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951