Jones v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
“If the accused admits the killing with a deadly weapon, but adds an explanation which might negative malice, no presumption that the homicide was murder would arise on such admission; but if no explanation were added tending to reduce the grade of the homicide, that presumption would arise.” Futch v. State, 90 Ga. 472, 473 (8) (16 S. E. 102); Perkins v. State, 124 Ga. 6 (52 S. E. 17); Green v. State, 124 Ga. 343 (52 S. E. 431); Mann v. State, 124 Ga. 760 (53 S. E. 324, 4 L. R. A. (NS) 934). “Where the evidence relied upon by the State to establish the fact of the homicide…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Futch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Mullis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Myrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nolen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Tew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Ginn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.