Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1956No. 19177PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

“If the accused admits the killing with a deadly weapon, but adds an explanation which might negative malice, no presumption that the homicide was murder would arise on such admission; but if no explanation were added tending to reduce the grade of the homicide, that presumption would arise.” Futch v. State, 90 Ga. 472, 473 (8) (16 S. E. 102); Perkins v. State, 124 Ga. 6 (52 S. E. 17); Green v. State, 124 Ga. 343 (52 S. E. 431); Mann v. State, 124 Ga. 760 (53 S. E. 324, 4 L. R. A. (NS) 934). “Where the evidence relied upon by the State to establish the fact of the homicide…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Futch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Mullis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Myrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nolen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Tew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Ginn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API