In re Takvorian

OPINION OF THE COURT

The respondent was served with a petition dated June 19, 1996, which contained six charges of professional misconduct against him. In his answer, as amended, the respondent denied most of the factual allegations contained in the petition and denied that he was guilty of any professional misconduct. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained Charge Six only. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report insofar as it sustains Charge Six and to otherwise disaffirm the report. The respondent cross-moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report.

Ch…