Legal Opinion

Hall v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Muskegon. Assumpsit. Defendant Hall brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This was an action of assumpsit brought to recover on a non-negotiable promissory note payable to Mrs. John W. Young and by her assigned to defendants in error as collateral security for the debt of her husband. The defense set up was that the note was given without consideration, and that it was never assigned to the plaintiffs, — defendants in error, — the same having been obtained by them by means of fraudulent representations made by their agent.

On the trial there was evidence given tending to show that the note‘was a gift to Mrs. Young without consideration, and there also was evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Seeley v. PriceMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Whiting v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Mizner v. KussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Strand v. Librascope, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
  4. Smith v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. American Building & Loan Ass'n v. BearNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API