Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson County
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 12, 1923No. 986Published
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
In 1919, Henderson county entered into a written contract with Williams, Burk & Co., for the improvement of one of its public roads. The following provisions of the contract are material to the facts of this appeal:
“This agreement made this 29th day of December, 1919, by and between Henderson, county, Tex., represented by the commissioners’ court, party of the first part, and Wiliams, Burk & Co., composed .of J. P. Williams, T. J. Burk and W. W. Scarborough of Jaekson-viller Tex., his their executor, administrators, heirs, successors or assigns, party of the second part; and subject to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Trinity Portland Cement Co. v. Lion Bonding & Surety Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- United States ex rel. Samuel Hastings Co. v. LowranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Baker Contract Co. v. United States ex rel. PennockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.