Legal Opinion

Fleischman v. Fleischman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 30, 1989No. 22059-4-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

Richard Fleischman (Richard) appeals from an order requiring that a Totten trust recipient bear the trust's pro rata share of estate tax liability. He contends the trial court misconstrued the tax clause at issue. We affirm.

Victor F. Fleischman (Victor) died testate in 1987. In addition to property passing under the will, Victor's taxable ¿state included a $412,000 bank account established by Victor, naming himself as trustee for Richard. This account (hereinafter Totten trust) passed directly to Richard upon Victor's death. The co-executors of Victor's will could not agree whether estate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bemis v. ConverseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. MacOmberWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re Lidston's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re Thomas' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In Re the Estate of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Venables v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Fleischman v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Rhay v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API