Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1976No. Docket 22814PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P. J.

We must determine if present plaintiff has a right to continue his lawsuit against defendant, Chrysler Corporation, after plaintiff has released from liability four other defendants and they have been dismissed, with prejudice, from the litigation.

In 1968, plaintiff-appellant sought legal and equitable relief from the Wayne County Circuit Court, alleging that Peter Fink, Jack Freeman, and present appellee Chrysler defrauded plaintiff and other common stockholders of Frank Motor Homes. In 1971, two more defendants, PRF Industries and Travco Corporation, alleged to be the successor corporations…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moyses v. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Boucher v. ThomsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Van Liere v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Knapp v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. NewmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. QuinlanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  4. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Boyles v. Hyder (In re Boyles)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API