State v. Caton
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.
¶1 Michael Catón appeals his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. He argues: (1) the legislature violated separation of powers principles when it authorized county sheriffs under former RCW 9A.44.130(7) (2006) to designate a reporting date within a 90 day period for certain registered sex offenders, (2) former RCW 9A.44-.130(7) violates equal protection principles on the same basis, (3) former RCW 9A.44.130(7) is unconstitutionally vague, (4) admission of Caton’s sex offender registration form at trial violated his right to confront witnesses, and (5) sufficient evidence does…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CatonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, V Leldon Roy PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015