Arnold v. Chesebrough
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
In Equity.. On application for the appointment of a special examiner to take testimony.
1Opinion of the CourtLacombe, J.
This is an application for the appointment of a special examiner at Los Angeles, Cal., to take testimony under the sixty-seventh rule in equity. The power of a circuit court to appoint an examiner to act outside of its territorial jurisdiction is not free from doubt. Mr. Justice Bradley, sitting at circuit, has held that it has such power. Railroad Co. v. Drew, 3 Woods, 697. Mr. Justice Blatchford, sitting in this circuit, has repeatedly refused to make such orders as the one now applied for, on the expressed ground of lack of power. Orders appointing special examiners have no doubt since…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bischoffscheim v. BaltzerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- White v. Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- In re SpoffordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
- In re Robert Gair Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1912
- Hartman v. RheinstromU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899