Hockenberry Unemployment Compensation Case

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and board denied benefits to the claimant under §102(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 13 PS §802(a), because she refused to accept an offer of suitable work because she felt she was not qualified to do the job.

*329The appellant was last employed by the Waynesboro Shoe Company, Waynesboro, Pennsylvania, her last day of work being October 7, 1960, at which time she was laid off. She had been an operator of a sewing machine, doing shoe closings and top stitchings for a period of three years and earned…