Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 30, 2001No. CR-99-2592Published

1ConcurrenceBaschab, Judge

Based on Ex parte Hamlett, I am compelled to concur. However, as the dissent stated on application for a rehearing in Ex parte Hamlett, “the failure to swear the jury venire is the kind of judicial error the defendant must object to in the trial court to preserve it for appellate review.” — So.2d at -(citing Washington v. State, 81 Ala. 35, 38, 1 So. 18, 20 (1887)). Longstanding precedent also establishes that error cannot be predicated on a silent record. See Schrimsher v. State, 25 Ala.App. 471, 149 So. 353 (Ala.Ct.App.1933); Doby v. State, 15 Ala.App. 591, 74 So. 724 (Ala.Ct.App.1917).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Doby v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Schrimsher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API