Legal Opinion
Subcliff v. Brandt Engineered Products, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided October 3, 2006No. 3:05-cv-00001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT IPSCO TUBULARS INC.
WALTERS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court following hearing on third-party defendant IP-SCO Tubulars Inc.’s (IPSCO) motion for summary judgment [51]. The underlying action was filed by Clinton Subcliff on January 4, 2005. In it he makes product liability claims alleging design defect, manufacturing defect and failure to warn, as well as negligence claims, against Brandt Engineered Products, Ltd. (Brandt) and Walsh Automation, Inc. (Walsh), 1 based on the design and installation of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hartnagel v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- William J. Sprenger v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Eugene Herring v. The Canada Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John T. Jones Construction Co. v. Hoot General ConstructionDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2008
- Rigoberto Quiles v. Alan JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Hayes v. Deere & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023