Legal Opinion
Phillips v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 8, 1967No. 7372Published
1Per curiam
Affirmed under the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 328; Linton v. Cox, 358 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1966); and Hamrick v. Boles, 231 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.W.Va.1964). Cf. Mason v. United States, 303 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1962).
*917We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamrick v. BolesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1964
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- John R. Linton v. Harold A. Cox, Warden, New Mexico State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- William Carlton Mason v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962