Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Ferguson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8203PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Action by the appellant against the appellees to recover the value or proceeds of certain hog products sold by the'defendants. The pleadings need not be stated, as no question arises upon them. Trial by the court and special finding of the facts and statement of conclusions of law, as follows:

“First. In the year 1871 the defendants were partners and the owners of a slaughtering and pork-packing establishment in the city of Indianapolis, and had for many years prior to that time been engaged in that business in that city. That said business embraced the slaughtering and dressing of hogs, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Stearns v. MarshNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Belden v. PerkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Baltimore Marine Insurance v. DalrympleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  5. Hanna v. PhelpsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vinton v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Rosenzweig v. FrazerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Duffy v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lovejoy v. Merchants' State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Holderman v. ManierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API