St. Clair v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
Appellant has prosecuted an appeal from each of two judgments of conviction of the crime of selling whisky, hut, as the cases are similar, the attorneys have, by.consent, briefed them together, and the two cases will be disposed of in one opinion. ■
There are two separate indictments charging the sale ocf whiskey on the same day, but the oases were tried on different days of the term of court. It was the contention of the prosecuting attorney that two separate offenses were involved, and such is the contention of the Attorney General now, but counsel for appellant contends that there was only…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Beck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Calloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923