Legal Opinion

Benham v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NC

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 15, 2011No. 10-1132PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge GREGORY joined.

OPINION

KING, Circuit Judge:

In September 2007, Philip Benham, Sheryl Chandler, and Operation Save America (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), initiated this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in the Western District of North Carolina, seeking injunctive relief and damages from the City of Charlotte and two of its officials, Keith Parker and Emily Westbrook (collectively, the “City”). The Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that two Charlotte ordinances contravene, inter alia, the Free…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Albert Clatterbuck v. City of CharlottesvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. Niya Kenny v. Alan WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. Steve Cooksey v. Michelle FutrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Ross Abbott v. Harris PastidesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API