Legal Opinion

Nebel v. Nebel

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 2, 1968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

99 N.J. Super. 256 (1968)

239 A.2d 266

JEANNE D. NEBEL, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ARTHUR J. NEBEL, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided February 2, 1968.

Mr. Harold G. Pierson for plaintiff.

Mr. Colin M. Dillon for defendant (Messrs. Pollis, Williams, Pappas & Dillon, attorneys).

WOOD, WM. FILLMORE, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This case raises the question of whether this court has authority to require a divorced husband, on motion of the wife, to contribute toward the college expenses of an 18-year-old son in the mother's custody. The New Jersey law on the question is not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bonanno v. BonannoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Larsen v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Cohen v. CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Streitwolf v. StreitwolfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  5. Jonitz v. JonitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Newburgh v. ArrigoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Grotsky v. GrotskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. Khalaf v. KhalafSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. Kiken v. KikenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Colantoni v. ColantoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API