Legal Opinion

Matter of Colestock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1984No. 182S35PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The Respondent, Robert D. Colestock, has been charged by an one-count verified complaint for disciplinary action with engaging in a prohibited conflict of interests. The Hearing Officer appointed by this Court has submitted his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The Respondent now petitions for review of the findings and conclusions and also requests an oral argument.

This Court finds that Respondent’s petition for oral argument should be and hereby is denied.

The Respondent has also filed a “Petition for Review of all the Evidence”. This Court arrives at the final findings of fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Tippecanoe County CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Matter of CrumpackerIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Matter of CallahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Matter of ZinmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Sercon Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Matter of RobakIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Shuttleworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Matter of CarmanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re ShirleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API