Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cordrey v. Holter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1973No. 72-286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McNULTY, Judge.

Appellant sought by mandamus to compel the town officials of Redington Beach to enforce an ordinance allegedly prohibiting the allowing of dogs upon the beaches in the town. She appeals an order denying issuance of the peremptory writ. We affirm.

*140A copy of the ordinance in question was introduced into evidence and the material portions thereof, including apparent deletions, read as follows:

“It is unlawful and prohibited for any person ... to use or operate upon any beach or shoreline . within the town limits . any . . . fefsyele . . . [e? te bring ©f have e? allow t-hereon asy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kent v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Beck v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Ramsey v. City of KissimmeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. City of Evarts v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. North Beach Yellow Cab Co. v. Village of Bal HarbourDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paragon Group, Inc. v. HoeksemaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API