Legal Opinion
Weiner v. Lenox Hill Hospital
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louis B. York, J.
In this action, plaintiff moves to obtain sanctions against defendants for failure to comply with discovery. Lenox Hill cross-moves to obtain a protective order concerning some of *760plaintiffs demanded discovery.1 Among other things, this motion and cross motion require the court to address the scope of CPLR 3101 (f), which governs the discoverability of insurance information.2
BACKGROUND
Between October 1984 and January 1985, Dale Korn was a patient in the care of defendant Lenox Hill Hospital (Lenox Hill). During this time, Ms. Korn received transfusions of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abood v. Hospital Ambulance Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lloyd v. GrellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Russo v. RochfordNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- PCB Piezotronics, Inc. v. ChangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Ford v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Evans v. LerchNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- Weiner v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996