Legal Opinion

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1986No. 85-1017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

I

The first issue before us is whether the company is entitled to recover the payment of an increased excise tax levy made after November 15, 1981 pursuant to legislative enactment Am. Sub. H. B. No. 694, effective May ,1, 1981. This legislation increased the excise tax rate on gross receipts for public utilities in three ways. First, the permanent tax rate was increased from 4 percent to 4.25 percent. Second, a temporary one-year tax increase of .25 percent was imposed. Third, a surtax of .21 percent was levied. The three increases, totaling .71 percent, were effective *137with gross receipts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Condee v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API