Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 1982No. 4-82-0135PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

Trial in absentia.

Guilty of burglary and theft.

Were the statutory admonitions given?

No.

We must reverse and remand.

Watson raises no question of the sufficiency of the evidence presented at his trial, so no extended recitation of those facts is necessary. But the enumeration of certain procedural occurrences are required to address his claim that he was improperly tried in absentia.

Watson was charged by information with burglary and theft and a warrant for his arrest was issued on June 4, 1981. He was arrested on June 11, but was released on June 15, after posting bond. His case was continued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. ZielinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. ParteeIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. United States v. Andre C. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. People v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. People v. VelascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. BroyldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API