Legal Opinion

Friedland v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided April 25, 2011No. Docket No. 13926-10WUnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY S. FRIEDLAND, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Friedland v. Comm'r

Docket No. 13926-10W.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2011-90; 2011 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 88; 101 T.C.M. (CCH) 1422;

April 25, 2011, Filed

Murray S. Friedland, Pro se.

John T. Kirsch, for respondent.

KROUPA, Judge.

KROUPA

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KROUPA, Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, as supplemented. We are asked to decide two issues. We must first determine whether a letter respondent sent to petitioner denying petitioner's whistleblower claims…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Pyo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  3. Kluger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  4. Judge v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  5. Cooper v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Friedland v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  2. Thomas M. Comparini & Vicki Comparini v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  3. Amsinger v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  4. Comparini v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  5. Comparini v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API