Friedland v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY S. FRIEDLAND, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Friedland v. Comm'r
Docket No. 13926-10W.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2011-90; 2011 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 88; 101 T.C.M. (CCH) 1422;
April 25, 2011, Filed
Murray S. Friedland, Pro se.
John T. Kirsch, for respondent.
KROUPA, Judge.
KROUPA
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KROUPA, Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, as supplemented. We are asked to decide two issues. We must first determine whether a letter respondent sent to petitioner denying petitioner's whistleblower claims…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Pyo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Kluger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Judge v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Cooper v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Friedland v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- Thomas M. Comparini & Vicki Comparini v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
- Amsinger v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Comparini v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014
- Comparini v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.