Legal Opinion

Matter of Warren

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 4, 1989PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on appeal as of right under Rule 2:2-l(a)(2) because of a disagreement among the Appellate Division members over whether the Merit System Board had properly determined that a period of suspension, and not removal, was the appropriate discipline for a prison guard. The dissent concerns only the discipline of John E. Warren, one of the parties charged.

All agree that a court may not contravene the Board’s measure of discipline unless the court finds that the Board’s action was arbitrary and capricious. This shorthand expression for the scope of judicial review really…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henry v. Rahway State PrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. State v. BenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Karins v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. New Jersey Coalition of Health Care Professionals, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Banking & InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. MISSISSIPPI MILK COM'N v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Board of Education v. Board of Education v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API