Stieglitz v. City Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
2Per curiam
The respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted on the authority of Gelinas v. City of South Miami, 522 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Paul v. City of Miami Beach, 519 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Johnson v. Citizens State Bank, 518 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). As we did in Gelinas and Paul, we certify the question presented:
WHEN A PARTY SEEKS APPELLATE REVIEW OF A NON-APPEALABLE ORDER, AND ASSUMING THAT THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS TIMELY FILED IN THE LOWER TRIBUNAL, MUST THE NOTICE OF APPEAL BE FILED IN THE APPELLATE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER IN ORDER…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Citizens State BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Paul v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Gelinas v. City of South MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
4Cited by2 opinions
- Downey v. JUNGLE DEN VILLAS REC. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Stieglitz v. City CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1989