Legal Opinion

King v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 1988No. 87-1436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Judge.

David E. King appeals from his judgment and sentence for armed robbery. He argues that the trial court erred in exceeding the presumptive guidelines sentence without clear and convincing reasons. We reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

The appellant was tried by jury and found guilty of three counts of armed robbery. Thereafter, at the sentencing hearing the trial court found the appellant to be a habitual offender and departed from the presumptive guidelines sentence solely on that basis.

The appellant appealed from that departure sentence and this court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API