Legal Opinion

Porter v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 27, 1946No. 963Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBOURNE, District Judge.

Plaintiff invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under the provisions of Subsection (c) of Section 925 of Title 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, seeking an injunction during the pendency of the action and on final hearing a permanent injunction, both as provided in subsection (a) of that section.

The case is now before the Court upon plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction.

The petition avers that in the plaintiff’s judgment, the defendant “has engaged and is about to engage in acts and practices declared unlawful by section 4(a)" of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 904(a).

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M. Kraus & Bros., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Di Melia v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  3. Bowles v. Lee's Ice Cream, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API