Santos Ex Rel. Beato v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentO’Neill, J.
I respectfully dissent.
I agree with the majority’s statement of the facts and characterization of the issues before us. The first disputed issue, whether in any circumstance there can be equitable tolling of the FTCA’s limitations period, is complicated and has created a significant circuit split.
In Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct. 453, 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990), the Supreme Court held that non-jurisdictional statutes of limitations governing actions against the United States are subject to “the same rebuttable presumption of equitable tolling applicable to suits…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.