Legal Opinion · Dissent

Triple a Contractors, Inc. v. Rural Water District No. 4

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 1, 1979No. 49,911Published

1DissentPrager, J.

I respectfully dissent. The majority has chosen to adopt a minority position in holding that one who makes a unilateral mistake in bidding on a construction contract is precluded in all cases from seeking equitable relief by way of rescission. Jones, The Law of Mistaken Bids, 48 Cin. L. Rev. 43 (1979). The basis of the court’s decision is the fear that to hold otherwise would undermine the integrity of the bidding system. The opinion makes it clear that the bid contract, not the construction contract, is what is being enforced.

Most jurisdictions allow relief by rescission from a unilateral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Board of Edn. v. Sever-Williams Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Susquehanna County CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API