Legal Opinion

Janklow v. Keller

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1976No. File 11588, 11589PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Circuit Judge.

The captioned cases, which arise from the same facts and present the same legal questions, were argued together and will be dealt with together in this opinion.

Plaintiff-appellants brought these actions seeking damages from the defendants for deceit and defamation. The trial court dismissed each action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Basically, the dismissals were on the grounds that the statements complained of were privileged under SDCL 20-11-5(2) because they were made in a judicial proceeding by counsel, and the statements had some…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Hackworth v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonoughUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Janklow v. Viking PressSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. William Janklow v. Newsweek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Flugge v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wm. Collins, Inc. v. South Dakota State Board of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API