Legal Opinion

Fort Edward, C., Plank Road Co. v. . Payne

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1857PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I think that the instrument signed by the defendant is wholly void, by reason of the condition therein contained. It was intended as a subscription to the capital stock of the company. The act under which the plaintiff was incorporated prescribes the manner of subscribing for stock, and only authorizes absolute subscriptions. This case cannot be distinguished in principle from Butterworth, c., Turnpike Company v. North (1 Hill, 518). It was held, in that case,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Woodstock Iron Co. v. Richmond & Danville Extension Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Craig v. . Town of AndesNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Flaherty v. CaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. First National Bank v. HendrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. General Electric Co. v. WightmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API