Legal Opinion

Brancato v. Gunn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 12, 1999No. 98-9913PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Pro se petitioner Braneato seeks leave to proceed informa pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny this request as frivolous pursuant to Rule 39.8. Braneato is allowed until November 2, 1999, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38 and to submit his petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33.1. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any further petitions for certiorari from Braneato in noneriminal matters unless he first pays the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and submits his petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1.

Braneato has abused this Court’s certiorari…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Palmdale Hills Property, LLC v. Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Carter Ex Rel. M.C. v. DoyleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  3. United States v. Ardelle Dunlap, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. (HC) Harris v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PS) Santillan v. California Bar ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API