Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Mutual Insurance v. Manson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The surplus notes which are the bases of the respective claims of appellant and respondent were executed pursuant to the authority of sec. 201.17 (2), Stats. 1955. That subsection of the statute makes the acceptance of the terms imposed therein a condition for the issuance of surplus notes. Whether the notes issued pursuant to statute are presently payable depends upon the meeting of the conditions set forth in the statute. Sec. 201.17 (2) provides:

“Any mutual insurance company may borrow money from any officer, member or other person, for the purposes of its business or to enable it to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oatman v. Batavian BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Mattek v. HoffmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. National Warehouse Corp. v. Banking CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Mid-Continent Mut. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Bank v. Miller (In Re Miller)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. In Re: Richard Miller V.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API