United States v. Sidney Barcelon
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The major issue presented by this appeal is whether the district court “appropriately inquired” into appellant Sidney Barcelon’s ability to pay attorney’s fees under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (1982) (the “Act”), before denying his re quest for appointed counsel. 1 For the reasons stated below, we remand to the district court for further proceedings.
I
On October 10, 1984, Barcelon, was indicted along with forty-four other defendants and charged with one count of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and two counts of possession with…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roy Wilson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. KahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States of America Ex Rel. William Davis v. Hon. Daniel McMann Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York,respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Mary Ann Tavery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Kenneth G. Brockman, United States of America v. Carolyn A. KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. William R. GravattCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.