Legal Opinion

Cardesa v. Humes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1819PublishedCited by 1 opinion

THIS case was tried before Duncan J. at Nisi Prius, in February last, and a verdict found for the plaintiff. A motion was now made, by the defendants, for a new r J ' trial.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Gibson J.

The agreement set up at the trial was entered into prior to the judgment which this scire facias is brought to revive, and might have been urged as a defence to the original suit. The defendants contend, there are peculiar circumstances exempting this case from the operation of the rule which excludes, as a defence to a scire facias, all matter that might have been taken advantage of in the original suit; because, as they say, the agreement could not have been used as a defence without violating it; and because the judgment was obtained by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huffsmith v. LeveringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API