Legal Opinion

Hendrick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1937No. A-9263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

The defendant was charged by information with the crime of murder, was tried, convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and his punishment assessed at a term of seven years in the penitentiary. From this judgment and sentence he has appealed to this court.

It is the contention of the defendant that the court erred in the giving of two instructions, Nos. 11 and 14, and that the court erred in failing to give two requested instructions. Instructions Nos. 11 and 14 are as follows:

“No. 11. If you believe from the evidence or have a reasonable doubt as to whether it reasonably appeared to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. McDaniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Davison v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Weatherholt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hancock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. State v. WashingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. WashingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hancock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API