Legal Opinion · Dissent

Company "A" First Regiment North Dakota National Guard Training School v. Hughes

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925Published

1DissentBuRKE, J.

On former appeal of this action Company A v. Hughes, 49 N. D. 626, 193 N. W. 144, this court held “that witnesses who were members and directors of a corporation are not by virtue of that fact alone, qualified to testify to the value of property of the corporation, which is alleged to have been converted.” That decision is the law of this case. Schmidt v. Beiseker, 19 N. D. 35, 120 N. W. 1096.

The evidence in this case is the same as the evidence in the former trial. The witnesses are the same except, that one Langley, who was one of the principal witnesses in the former trial, was not a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Pacific Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Schmidt v. BeisekerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Slade v. SladeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Company A, First Regiment v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Burchinell v. ButtersColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API