Anthony v. M'Call
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Rush Circuit-Court.
1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.
This is an action of assumpsit. The plaintiff, the administrator de bonis non of Abraham Carey, deceased, declares .against the defendant, administrator of Samuel Carey, deceased, for an alleged devastavit by Samuel Carey, the administrator of the plaintiff’s intestate.
The declaration charges that, in 1818, Samuel Carey, administrator of Abraham Carey, wasted and converted to his own use, goods, &c. of the said Abraham Carey, to the value of 300 dollars. That the said Samuel, afterwards, to wit, in the year 1826, promised to pay the value of the goods so wasted and converted. Yet neither the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Young v. KimballIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- Lucas v. DonaldsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ormes' Estate v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- State ex rel. Pierson v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1848