Denham v. Trinity County Lumber Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Trinity. Tried below before Hon. Herman G. Kittrell.
1Opinion of the Court
Henry, Associate Justice.—
Plaintiff’s petition charges that the defendant company was engaged in operating a steam saw mill; that he was an employe of the company, and being near the machinery of the mill was seriously injured by a blow from a portion of the machinery becoming detached and being hurled with great force upon his head and body, and that the machinery was defective, as was well known to defendant. Ho exceptions to plaintiff’s pleadings were acted upon by the court below.
*81The defendant by its answer denied that plaintiff was in its employment or rightfully at its mill when…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Trinity County Lumber Co. v. DenhamTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Security Union Ins. Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Berryman v. NorfleetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.