Pedro Jose Domingues v. State

Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation based upon a finding that he was arrested for DUI. He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress, because no reasonable suspicion to stop appellant arose from a report of a domestic disturbance call. We agree that the call did not provide reasonable suspicion and reverse.

The state charged appellant with a violation of his probation based upon his arrest for DUI. He moved to suppress the evidence against him, claiming that an officer stopped him without reasonable suspicion that he had committed or was about to commit a…