Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Barbour

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 2010No. 2009-KA-1258Published

1ConcurrenceBelsome, J.

hi write separately to acknowledge that historically, a defendant could not be convicted unless the jury verdict was unanimous. Arie M. Rubenstein, Verdicts of Conscience: Nullification and the Modem Jury Trial, 106 Colum. L.Rev. 959, 979 (2006)(citing Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404, 407 & n. 2, 92 S.Ct. 1628, 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972)(White, J., plurality opinion); see also State v. Williams (unpub.), 2009-0602 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/27/10, 26 So.3d 321)(Belsome, J., dissenting). The concept of a unanimous jury verdict began as early as the fourteenth century. Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. at 407-08,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. BertrandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API