Legal Opinion

Duran v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1999No. 97-302PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

This is a review by writ of certiorari1 in which Petitioner Cheryl Duran appeals from the conviction and sentence entered against her for aggravated vehicular homicide. Duran challenges the trial court’s refusal of battered woman syndrome expert testimony and self-defense instructions and the admission of evidence of the victim’s peaceful character. On this issue of first impression, we hold that because Duran was charged with a crime involving a reckless act, rather than an intentional act, the affirmative defense of self-defense is not available to her. It necessarily…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Baier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. HantonWashington Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Anthony Haire v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Holloman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ruby Drilling Co., Inc. v. Duncan Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API