Ward v. Huggins
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
The respondent moves the court to strike the statement of facts and the exhibits from the transcript, on the grounds — First, Because the same are improperly made a part of the transcript; being originals and not copies as required by law; second, because the statement of facts was settled without having given the respondent any notice thereof as required by law; third, because said statement is not certified to as required by law.
While the law contemplates that the clerk shall send up to this court a copy of the statement of facts, we do not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Knox v. ClevelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Oconto Co. v. JerrardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Edgerton v. BirdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- National Surety Corp. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Huber v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- O'Keefe v. DillenbeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Potwin v. BlasherWashington Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.