State v. Walls
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
First degree escape requires proof that a defendant escaped from custody while detained pursuant to a felony conviction. RCW 9A.76.110(1). Police stopped Lonnie Walls pursuant to an outstanding felony warrant. He bolted. The questions are whether he was being “detained” pursuant to a felony conviction and whether his escape was from custody. We answer yes on both counts and affirm his conviction for first degree escape.
FACTS
An officer of the East Wenatchee Police Department saw Lonnie Walls and two other men walking down the street. The officer recognized the three men from prior contacts. He…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. WareCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. WareCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. BreshonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.