Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1929No. 3 Div. 897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

It is unquestionably the law, as settled by the decisions of this and many other courts, that the relationship of insured and insurer does not exist until after the acceptance of the application and the issuance of the policy, and that the applicant has' no right of action upon a contract until the issuance of the policy. Ala. Gold Life Ins. Co. v. Mayes, 61 Ala. 163. It also seems settled by our statutes and decisions that no action can be maintained on the coil- • tract as to benefit societies as well as old line insurance companies until after the com pletion of the contract. Alexander v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duffie v. Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. School District No. 55Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. MayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Savage v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of AmericaMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Telford v. Bingham County Farmers' Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Faulk v. New York Life Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Grand Lodge, K. P. of North America v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API